Skip to main content

A Working Definition of Beauty

How would you define beauty? It's actually really hard when you start thinking about it. I'm reading a book at the moment called The Beauty of the Infinite The Aesthetics of Christian truth. It's written by a man with a bigger brain than I'll ever have. It's the kind of book which, when you read it you can tell that he has so much to say he almost doesn't know where to start - or when to stop - and eventually ends up telling you more than perhaps he intended to. Not a criticism, just an observation. He won't go down as one of the great writers of our time, but he's absolutely one of the deepest thinkers. Anyway, he says this of beauty: "the modern disenchantment with the beautiful as a concept reflects in part a sense that while beauty is something whose event can be remarked upon, and in a way that seems to convey meaning, the word "beauty" indicates nothing: neither exactly a quality, nor a property, nor a function, not even really a subjective reaction to an object or occurrence, it offers no phenomenological purchase upon aesthetic experience".

He then proceeds to explain how beauty is a category indispensable to Christian thought, followed by six ways to describe what beauty is, spanning ten pages. Not bad for something which indicates nothing.

He's got a point, though. Beauty is a hard to pin down concept. And perhaps the word "beauty" does indicate nothing specific without a context to wrap itself in. But I'd like to have a go at a working definition. Perhaps another time I'll then have a go at thinking through why it is a category indispensable to Christian thought. But the entire blog is pretty much for that end.

It's worth saying that the dictionary does a decent job, actually, of defining beauty:

"The quality present in a thing or person that gives intense pleasure or deep satisfaction to the mind, whether arising from sensory manifestations (as shape, color, sound, etc.), a meaningful design or pattern, or something else (as a personality in which high spiritual qualities are manifest)".

That's a highly practical definition that touches on the most observable factors behind a beauty experience. But I think we can go into even more detail. So here's my attempt.

In one of my previous posts on the beauty of the Church, I wrote the following:

"If we say that what we perceive as beauty is: the relationship between the moral and aesthetic dimension of a thing, beauty becomes eminently important and useful in that everything that is, is moral and aesthetic. This is why we can say that everything is beautiful. Thus, our understanding of how beauty exists serves as a framework of understanding of everything.

The relationship between the moral dimension and the aesthetic dimension is vitally important. In fact, the aesthetic dimension depends upon there being a moral dimension and cannot exist without it. A moral dimension can exist without an aesthetic and actually, necessarily precedes an aesthetic. Yet the moral desires an aesthetic. And its value (beauty) depends upon, in large part, achieving an aesthetic expression (though not always, and not entirely)"

The seed of the actual definition (of sorts) is contained within the first sentence, so let me refine the proposition: beauty is the satisfying harmony of relationship between a moral entity and its counterpart aesthetic expression.

You can see why David Bentley Hart decided the word beauty indicates nothing. My definition doesn't necessarily refer to anything specific, either. It's laden with possibility, however, and the value of such a definition is in its ability to help us discern beauty anywhere. It teaches us to look for the satisfaction we can derive from the perceived harmony of relationship between the moral and aesthetic qualities of a thing - anything. Of course we can discern and define beauty in the moral and aesthetic dimensions separately. But the definition I have put forward urges us not simply to gorge ourselves on mere aesthetic qualities (which can end up giving a quick fix pleasure kick, then very quickly become disappointing), but to seek the highest and best beauties there are, by considering an aesthetic alongside its moral counterpart in order to discern their true value and rank thems correctly. This is useful because it is when we begin to discern and appreciate aesthetic beauty apart from moral beauty, that we can become prone to deception! (More on that deceit in another post). Indeed, the moral and the aesthetic together are important, because that is where beauty most accurately perceived and pleasure most honestly experienced. The interesting thing about this is that since a moral component is necessarily born from intelligence and is, by nature, for the benefit of intelligence, we learn that what we can describe as beautiful is that which prospers intelligent relationships and promotes intelligent flourishing. And if that can happen anywhere, as my definition of beauty allows, then we begin to understand - I think - what the created order is all about. God and people.

Well, I wonder what you think of that. I'm clearly still getting to grips with how broad and comprehensive, if not elusive, this word is. But it's always fun to have a go, I think.


Popular posts from this blog

Does God care what you look like? Part 1: Yes!

Does God care about the way we look? Does he care about our bodies, our hairstyles or our clothing? Does he care about tattoos or a wonky nose - or perhaps a scar or physical defect? In my church, we generally don't care about what people look like. Black, white, fat, thin, fashionable, unfashionable. How someone looks might be a very occasional point of interest, but generally speaking, what someone looks like will not have a significant influence on our judgement or value of a person. Heck, even I managed to get away with leading a Sunday service in shorts without getting so much as a raised eyebrow. Whilst the modern day, western, evangelical church scene will be keen to point out that there are more important things to worry about than what people look like - taking a sort of "man looks on the outward appearance, but God looks on the heart" approach - the rest of the world is obsessed with personal appearance. Beauty is big business and hot topic All you ha

Jesus IS Ruling Well

Jesus IS Ruling Well As I was reflecting on 2020 and pondering the year ahead, a verse from Psalm 118 came to mind. As it turns out the whole Psalm is full of the type of wisdom that will help us all to reflect on a year we didn’t expect and will help us prepare for a year we can’t really predict. Psalm 118 offers us three things to remember about God, and then an appropriate response at the end. This little transcript is in no way an in-depth exegesis of the whole psalm - so full of glory as it is - but touches on the key points which are of most use to use for helping us get to grips with how God operates in the world. Point one: Remember that God is good The first thing we need to remember according to the psalm is that God is good . Give thanks to the Lord for he is good. That's how the psalm begins. Right from the off, the psalmist is establishing the innate goodness of God. It’s the premise of the rest of the psalm and good practice for us, to recognise that God is a good God

The Importance of Plastic

What I like about philosophy is that you have an idea which you express in a certain way, according to the language you use, the words you know, the analogies you can think of, the categories you have defined, the context you exist in etc... But then you spot something, another idea, expressed rather differently and related to a different situation, yet somehow it seems eerily familiar. I love it when I see a conceptual crossover of ideas. I love Francis Schaeffer's 'line of despair' idea, I love Elaine Scarry's 'beauty makes copies of itself' idea and I love Piet Mondrian's 'plastic art' idea, to name but a few off the top of my head. It's quite reassuring and encouraging to find resonance in your own thinking with the ideas of great minds. But not necessarily surprising. God made the world to work a certain way, so why shouldn't people come up with similar ideas about how to interpret the material and spiritual universe? Anyway, I want to b