Skip to main content

Training to love


It's rather obvious from nature that things are not equally beautiful. Compare, for instance, the paving slab mentioned in the previous post, to a flower. Or yet again compare that flower to a carefully arranged bouquet or, again, the bouquet to a well cultivated botanical garden. It's not that the single flower, plucked fresh from the bush, is not beautiful in an of itself; of course, it can and should be admired for those qualities it possesses. Yet to add the imagination, the creativity, and the skill, as well as the greater quantity and variation of flowers into producing an elegant bouquet, reveals beauty greater still, both in quantity and quality. A botanical garden is even more glorious in proportion, displaying an even greater wealth of variety; each component combined to complement another for the sake of being pleasing to the senses. Beauty appears to us in increments, in order that we might experience it in differing amounts and qualities.

The purpose of beauty being revealed in increments, or grades, or degrees as you could say, is to train people to love it. When we get a little taste of something we enjoy, we often want more of it. If you see a painting you particularly enjoy, you're likely to want to see more work by the artist. If you hear a song you like, you will also seek after more of the same. Even more than a desire for more in quantity of what we enjoy is the greater experience of quality. For instance, in order enhance the experience of a particular song I enjoy, I will seek to learn about the person(s) who created it. Knowing about the skill of the musicians, the purpose of the song, the reason it was written and how creatively it was composed etc all feed into broadening and enhancing the experience of beauty I get from listening to it - the flower has become a bouquet and I love it more.

So, the greater the experiences of beauty that we encounter are, the more we want to encounter them. And we seek after greater and greater experiences of beauty. We love beauty because it overwhelms us, and we love to be overwhelmed by beauty, and so we seek after it. Beauty opens up our hearts and directs our affections toward itself - more and more of itself. And as our experiences broaden, so too do our affections. We are led on a journey of constant growth in love for the beautiful, as we learn to love it in greater and greater quantity and quality. We pick the flower and we love it. We pick some more and make a bunch that we love even more. We plant a garden and our hearts grow further. And it goes on and on like this. I believe that it because, if we follow, our hearts in this way, from beauty to beauty to greater beauty, eventually we should be led to God Himself, who is beautiful, who is beauty, who is the most beautiful, and from whom everything else gets its beauty. Nothing is beautiful without reference to Him.

So far I have been speaking in ideal terms. To deal with the fact that we live in an imperfect world is for another post. It's not likely that you will get the advice from your church leaders to follow your heart, which is deceitful above all things. However, speaking hypothetically, God has made a beautiful world, because He has designed us to love beauty, because He is beautiful. And so He puts beauty into the created order, in varying increments, that he might lead us on a trail that culminates with Himself. So, when we reach Him and understand Him to be the source of all beauty and the most beautiful, we are fully satisfied in our pursuit. And there is this sense in which the variation of beauty in the world, is there to train us to follow our hearts, to seek after greater and greater experiences of beauty, until we reach God. To love beauty a little, then a bit more, then a bit more, until we find God and are able to love Him the most. Beauty sets the orientation of our hearts and sets the trajectory for our affections. It directs us towards that which bring it the most satisfaction - a relationship with almighty God. Back to Augustine and that wonderful question: Do we love anything but the beautiful? Of course not. God is beautiful and He's designed us to love beauty because He is beautiful. So when we find that our heartstrings are tugged at by the beauty of the created order, that's good, let's love it. But love it in proportion. Love the flowers. Love the bouquets more. Love the gardens further still. And love God most of all, as these things really are just an expression of who He is and they their beauty from Him.

Photo by Jason Briscoe on Unsplash






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does God care what you look like? Part 1: Yes!

Does God care about the way we look? Does he care about our bodies, our hairstyles or our clothing? Does he care about tattoos or a wonky nose - or perhaps a scar or physical defect? In my church, we generally don't care about what people look like. Black, white, fat, thin, fashionable, unfashionable. How someone looks might be a very occasional point of interest, but generally speaking, what someone looks like will not have a significant influence on our judgement or value of a person. Heck, even I managed to get away with leading a Sunday service in shorts without getting so much as a raised eyebrow. Whilst the modern day, western, evangelical church scene will be keen to point out that there are more important things to worry about than what people look like - taking a sort of "man looks on the outward appearance, but God looks on the heart" approach - the rest of the world is obsessed with personal appearance. Beauty is big business and hot topic All you ha

The Beauty of the Church

If we say that what we perceive as beauty is: the relationship between the moral and aesthetic dimension of a thing, beauty becomes eminently important and useful in that everything that is, is moral and aesthetic. This is why we can say that everything is beautiful. Thus, our understanding of how beauty exists serves as a framework of understanding of everything. The relationship between the moral dimension and the aesthetic dimension is vitally important. In fact, the aesthetic dimension depends upon there being a moral dimension and cannot exist without it. A moral dimension can exist without an aesthetic and actually, necessarily precedes and aesthetic. Yet the moral desires an aesthetic. And its value (beauty) depends upon, in large part, achieving an aesthetic expression (though not always, and not entirely). For instance, what good is the desire to be kind to someone (moral dimension) if the opportunity is never taken and the desire never acted upon (aesthetic dimension)? Or, wh

The problem is perception Pt2

The thing I find most frustrating as a graphic designer is when a client or colleague chooses the worst option presented to them or requests an amendment to a design that will make it worse, or just plain bad. Sometimes I just have to concede. Sometimes I just have to make do and follow through with the bad choice. But sometimes good design is really worth fighting for. What makes a really good piece of design worth fighting for is the benefit it provides that would not be achieved otherwise. Design that's worth fighting for is design that adds value, a lot of value, quantifiable value, compared to the alternative. And so, I see it as part of my job to, as far as is appropriate, help the client or colleague understand why one design is better than another - to help them have their perceptions changed. Often, I want to educate those I work with why I believe a certain design is better than another. I want them to end up on my side. I want them to change their mind - their per