Skip to main content

Training to love


It's rather obvious from nature that things are not equally beautiful. Compare, for instance, the paving slab mentioned in the previous post, to a flower. Or yet again compare that flower to a carefully arranged bouquet or, again, the bouquet to a well cultivated botanical garden. It's not that the single flower, plucked fresh from the bush, is not beautiful in an of itself; of course, it can and should be admired for those qualities it possesses. Yet to add the imagination, the creativity, and the skill, as well as the greater quantity and variation of flowers into producing an elegant bouquet, reveals beauty greater still, both in quantity and quality. A botanical garden is even more glorious in proportion, displaying an even greater wealth of variety; each component combined to complement another for the sake of being pleasing to the senses. Beauty appears to us in increments, in order that we might experience it in differing amounts and qualities.

The purpose of beauty being revealed in increments, or grades, or degrees as you could say, is to train people to love it. When we get a little taste of something we enjoy, we often want more of it. If you see a painting you particularly enjoy, you're likely to want to see more work by the artist. If you hear a song you like, you will also seek after more of the same. Even more than a desire for more in quantity of what we enjoy is the greater experience of quality. For instance, in order enhance the experience of a particular song I enjoy, I will seek to learn about the person(s) who created it. Knowing about the skill of the musicians, the purpose of the song, the reason it was written and how creatively it was composed etc all feed into broadening and enhancing the experience of beauty I get from listening to it - the flower has become a bouquet and I love it more.

So, the greater the experiences of beauty that we encounter are, the more we want to encounter them. And we seek after greater and greater experiences of beauty. We love beauty because it overwhelms us, and we love to be overwhelmed by beauty, and so we seek after it. Beauty opens up our hearts and directs our affections toward itself - more and more of itself. And as our experiences broaden, so too do our affections. We are led on a journey of constant growth in love for the beautiful, as we learn to love it in greater and greater quantity and quality. We pick the flower and we love it. We pick some more and make a bunch that we love even more. We plant a garden and our hearts grow further. And it goes on and on like this. I believe that it because, if we follow, our hearts in this way, from beauty to beauty to greater beauty, eventually we should be led to God Himself, who is beautiful, who is beauty, who is the most beautiful, and from whom everything else gets its beauty. Nothing is beautiful without reference to Him.

So far I have been speaking in ideal terms. To deal with the fact that we live in an imperfect world is for another post. It's not likely that you will get the advice from your church leaders to follow your heart, which is deceitful above all things. However, speaking hypothetically, God has made a beautiful world, because He has designed us to love beauty, because He is beautiful. And so He puts beauty into the created order, in varying increments, that he might lead us on a trail that culminates with Himself. So, when we reach Him and understand Him to be the source of all beauty and the most beautiful, we are fully satisfied in our pursuit. And there is this sense in which the variation of beauty in the world, is there to train us to follow our hearts, to seek after greater and greater experiences of beauty, until we reach God. To love beauty a little, then a bit more, then a bit more, until we find God and are able to love Him the most. Beauty sets the orientation of our hearts and sets the trajectory for our affections. It directs us towards that which bring it the most satisfaction - a relationship with almighty God. Back to Augustine and that wonderful question: Do we love anything but the beautiful? Of course not. God is beautiful and He's designed us to love beauty because He is beautiful. So when we find that our heartstrings are tugged at by the beauty of the created order, that's good, let's love it. But love it in proportion. Love the flowers. Love the bouquets more. Love the gardens further still. And love God most of all, as these things really are just an expression of who He is and they their beauty from Him.

Photo by Jason Briscoe on Unsplash






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Old Earth Aesthetics: Wrinkles in my Birthday Suit

I'm 32 years old. I don't have any wrinkles. Except when I smile or pull funny faces at the kids. So I'm 32 years old and I have wrinkles. I have a teeny flash of grey hair in my right-hand sideburn. You can see every vein that meanders through my hands, and I'm allergic to the rain. I'm allergic to gluten, pollen, mold, and furry animals. I've had a small piece of my lung removed and the left-hand side of my rib cage is still sensitive to the effects of that operation 14 years ago! I'm 32 years old and I'm well aware that my body is in decline. I'm dying. Like everyone else on the planet, sure. I'm wearing out. Entropy. Daily proving true the second law of thermodynamics. I will expire. You will expire. In short? I'm young, but I'm looking older by the day (despite being asked for i.d. recently). I'm not going to make 96 years old, that's for sure. My age will not triple. Even though the age of my greatest grandfather was triple

Does God care what you look like? Part 1: Yes!

Does God care about the way we look? Does he care about our bodies, our hairstyles or our clothing? Does he care about tattoos or a wonky nose - or perhaps a scar or physical defect? In my church, we generally don't care about what people look like. Black, white, fat, thin, fashionable, unfashionable. How someone looks might be a very occasional point of interest, but generally speaking, what someone looks like will not have a significant influence on our judgement or value of a person. Heck, even I managed to get away with leading a Sunday service in shorts without getting so much as a raised eyebrow. Whilst the modern day, western, evangelical church scene will be keen to point out that there are more important things to worry about than what people look like - taking a sort of "man looks on the outward appearance, but God looks on the heart" approach - the rest of the world is obsessed with personal appearance. Beauty is big business and hot topic All you ha

Old Earth Aesthetics: The Duck Test

Prompted by something I heard in a Kent Hovind seminar, I recently asked a colleague what he thought was more absurd: to say I don’t believe in evolution, or to say I think the earth isn’t billions of years old. Now, I asked this particular colleague partly because I knew he was smart enough to give me the answer I was looking for - the correct answer - which is that it’s more absurd to claim the earth is you and not billions of years old. Suffice to say he didn’t let me down and explained why. He thought about the question for a little moment and said that the reason it’s more absurd to say the earth is old is because evolution is automatically untrue (to his mind) if the age of the earth is young. So if you kill the old age idea, you necessarily kill the evolution idea. If you disprove evolution you don’t automatically disprove the old age theory, but if you dismiss with billions of years, you at the same time disprove evolution. Therefore the claim that the age of the earth is only